[Parution VO] The Elvish Writing Systems of J.R.R. Tolkien - Matthews Coombes - Version imprimable +- Forum Tolkiendil (https://forum.tolkiendil.com) +-- Forum : Tolkiendil - www.tolkiendil.com (https://forum.tolkiendil.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum : Tolkien, l'homme et son œuvre (https://forum.tolkiendil.com/forum-19.html) +--- Sujet : [Parution VO] The Elvish Writing Systems of J.R.R. Tolkien - Matthews Coombes (/thread-7575.html) |
[Parution VO] The Elvish Writing Systems of J.R.R. Tolkien - Matthews Coombes - Druss - 09.11.2015 Un kickstarter pour financer un ouvrage sur les systèmes d'écriture par Tolkien, par un certain Matt Coombes (inconnu au bataillon) : https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/614014046/the-elvish-writing-systems-of-jrr-tolkien?ref=video RE: Liens tolkienneux divers - Corchalad - 09.11.2015 Ah oui, c'est censé s'appeler : A definitive guide to Tolkien's Elvish writing systems including the Tengwar, Sarati & the Cirth, covering Quenya, Sindarin languages. (c'est moi qui souligne). Sachant que le dernier Parma a révélé, par exemple, des usages totalement insoupçonnés pour écrire le quenya, et que la publication des inédits de Tolkien en est arrivée en gros aux années 40. Il a vraiment tout compris, le gars. RE: Liens tolkienneux divers - Matt Coombes - 19.11.2015 (09.11.2015, 15:21)Corchalad a écrit : Ah oui, c'est censé s'appeler : A definitive guide to Tolkien's Elvish writing systems including the Tengwar, Sarati & the Cirth, covering Quenya, Sindarin languages. (c'est moi qui souligne). I was made aware of this post by a colleague, and I feel compelled to address this. Whilst the term "definitive" may be used somewhat loosely, it is nonetheless definitive in as far that it is more than a brief summation of unreliable internet sources - which have been the case previously. I am well aware of the latest findings in PE, but for the majority of the audience, there would be little place for inclusion into the book. Please remember this is not an academic publication, but a tribute to Tolkien's work. I have seen far too many people make mistakes using the Elvish languages, and the book is to in some way, alleviate these anomalies. I welcome discussion about the book, but to say I do not understand is unfounded, especially as the book has not yet been published, is simply unkind. Please respect the reasons for my publishing this book - I am by no means an authority on the subject, and no doubt there are people in this very forum who know more than I, but I am not doing this for fame! More and more people are finding Tolkien's work inspiring, and having found pleasure in them myself, I am trying to make the same possible for others through the publishing of my book. If anyone would like to discuss the book further, I would be happy to answer any questions. Regards to all (and apologies this is not in your native tongues - mon francais est n'est pas bonne... as you can see!) Matt RE: Liens tolkienneux divers - Druss - 19.11.2015 Thanks and welcome here Matt. Pour les français, voici une traduction rapide de ses propos : Citation :J'ai été alerté de ce post par un collègue et je me suis senti obligé de répondre. Bien que le terme "définitif" puisse être utilisé de façon plutôt vague, c'est néanmoins définitif dans le sens où c'est plus qu'un simple résumé de sources internet douteuses - ce qui était le cas précédemment. RE: Liens tolkienneux divers - Corchalad - 19.11.2015 Your clarification is welcome. Still, I may have been blunt, but I stand by my words regarding the title. "Definitive" is terribly misleading and cannot but lead your readers astray both regarding an informed appreciation of Tolkien's creation and the content of the book. You will never correct people's misrepresentations as you hope to if you are starting like that. And to an informed reader, it shouts "wrong!" as if you were claiming to write A refferrense for good spelling. Words matter. What you are writing is called an introduction, or a detailed introduction if you wish. This is still pretty useful indeed for newcomers to the field, who certainly cannot be expected to tackle the raw complexities of a PE, or for the many people more interested in using than studying the scripts (although a bit of study is of course inescapable). There is no wrong in writing such simplified accounts that may be a key to a fuller appreciation of the whole. Quite like The History of Middle-earth would have been difficult to enjoy without the previously published Silmarillion. But it is crucially important (and quite difficult in practice) to get people to understand that Tolkien's languages and scripts creations were in a state of flux and subject to constant experimentation, and (in such a setting) to be abundantly clear that what you are presenting is only a part of the iceberg. The tidiest one. Tolkien's uses are quite reminiscent of mediaeval scribal habits: there are clear sets of practices and traditions (reflected in various modes for the same language), but also a variability much greater that in modern orthographies. Actually, I think that pedagogically, Tolkien's scripts could be quite useful for people to grow more aware of the distinction between the language and the letter. RE: Liens tolkienneux divers - Matt Coombes - 20.11.2015 Thank you for the welcome... Please note that what you are arguing as the title of the book... is NOT the title. This was a summary title for the Kickstarter project. Now if I may also be blunt, you are making a big assumption regarding the content of the book in what you are stating - you have not seen the book - not even the contents page. Of course a concise summary of every word, marking and phoneme that came out of Tolkien would run into many many pages, but it is simply not something that would sell, nor be read by the potential captive audience. I could change the title.. "A brief summary of..", "A detailed introduction...", but this is my choice. If on purchasing the book, the reader does not feel they have gleaned sufficient information for their outlay, then of course they can be directed to Parma, VT, MUSE, Mallorn, Mythlore... but this is precisely the point. If my book gets people that far, then great. I feel that I have done the great man justice. I have made several references to journals, publications and academics in the book - I have even tackled the Sarati Diary Mode... admitedly started by Arden Smith, but I have further reconstructed the attested samples and drawn further conclusions. There is a lot of work put into the book, and I sincerely hope it can assist the cause. But please do not make further assumptions about me or my work. RE: Liens tolkienneux divers - Druss - 12.01.2016 À noter que le financement participatif de Matt Coombes pour son livre a été atteint dans son intégralité. Il n'y a donc plus qu'à attendre le livre en question. Vous pouvez suivre son actu : https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/614014046/the-elvish-writing-systems-of-jrr-tolkien/updates RE: Liens tolkienneux divers - Druss - 05.05.2016 Le bouquin en question est sorti et il faut avouer que le visuel est agréable : https://www.facebook.com/learnElvish/posts/1090457181017459 J'ai créé la fiche du coup. Vu le peu de publications de cet ordre, je me demande si on ne pourrait pas avoir un SP ? RE: [Parution VO] The Elvish Writing Systems of J.R.R. Tolkien - Matthews Coombes - Leaf - 31.10.2020 La critique de Damien Bador est disponible sur la fiche : écrite et malencontreusement oubliée en 2017 ; mise à jour avant la publication. |